Puppy love


I said goodbye to my Old Girl. Paris entered my life when my first puppy was dying of congenital kidney failure. She’d been with me longer than my husband and children. My confidant, gardening buddy and all around adored friend is gone.

Her birthday is in May; she would have been fourteen this year. Thirteen-plus years is a long life for a purebred lab, and I’m grateful she spent most of it by my side.

Her health had been declining for a while. It became evident that her hips were giving her trouble about two years ago. She was diagnosed with mega esophagus last summer. I had been conceptually inching toward her death, preparing to let her go, grieving her one moment at a time along the way.

I’d long-planned to let Paris help train a new puppy, and finally brought Pepper into our home last December. Paris was old, slower and a bit curmudgeonly at times, but still had a lot of spunk and was a wonderful, well-behaved dog with much to offer to a new one. The vomiting started a few weeks later, which was subsequent to the lack of appetite that didn’t resonate with me at the time. In hindsight, it seems that introducing Pepper was the pivot point where Paris decided she could finally let go.

When I took her to the vet for vomiting, x-rays revealed a significantly enlarged liver, likely full of tumors, which the vet presumed was cancer. It became immediately irrelevant, because bloodlabs revealed acute liver and kidney failure.

I had known she was declining. I had known 13.5 is old for a lab. I had presumed she’d be lucky to make it through 2018. What I had not known was that she was actively dying.

Shock overtook understanding. Miss Type A I-can-figure-out-anything-and-fix-it-just-watch-me immediately devised plans for supporting her liver so that she could feel better for as long as possible. Over the next 24 hours, however, I was able to release my death-grip on the fear of losing her and ask myself, “What is the point? She is old. She is dying. She is suffering. It would be for me, not for her.”

Everyone knows that dogs are nonjudgmental and selfless. Paris was also stoic and probably held out for me. The least I could do was let her go. It was beyond her time. I felt so bad for her. My heart was broken, but her body was on the verge of shutting down and that had to have sucked for her. There was only one thing perpetuating her suffering: me.

The anti-nausea meds helped her feel great for a few days. She was playing and spry, eating like crazy and back to stealing food from the kids with fervor. It simultaneously warmed and killed my heart; she was happy and herself, which were noticeable because she hadn’t been.

She and I had a heart-to-heart one morning while my husband and kids took Pepper for a long walk. Paris, on the couch, and I, on the floor, stared into one another’s eyes for what felt like eternity. I bawled my eyes out and my heart broke even more. She told me she was ready and I told her I  loved her but would let her go.

Her (presumed) cancer overtook the benefit of the meds after 3-4 days. We put her down six days after her diagnosis. Her last day was a rough one (my poor, Old Girl), but was preceded by a fantastic day where she played in the snow and with Pepper, ate well, seemed so happy and well that the thought of putting her down seemed criminal, even though I knew it wouldn’t have been.

A vet came to our house. The kids were comical. “So, you’re gonna give her a shot to kill her,” my five-year-old asserted. “We’re really sad but kind of glad because now Paris won’t be around to teach Pepper how to eat strawberries from Mama’s garden,” added my seven-year-old. The beauty of children is that they are honest, pragmatic, uninhibited. For them, a confluence of realities coexist. Perhaps they have a better handle on life than we adults do.

My oldest and I held on to Paris and cried the whole time. The youngest brought blueberries to share with the vet. My husband took it rough; Paris was his first dog. Our youngest didn’t breakdown until the vet left and the reality set in. He went to where Paris lay and cried his poor little heart out. Saying goodbye tore our hearts apart, but grieving together helped.

It’s impossible for me to list everything I do/will miss about Paris, but one thing I keep remembering is a time when my husband was traveling and my heart was a mess about our relationship. I plopped the kids in front of the television and hid away in my closet (which was also my office. Let the record show that my closet is technically a room. I live in a weird, old farmhouse). I curled up on the floor next to my oldest love, my unconditional friend: Paris. I lay there petting her, stroking her silky ears, staring into her amber eyes. I felt overcome with guilt. I neglect her all the time. I don’t pet her enough. I don’t talk to her enough. I used to walk her daily, but… kids. Yet in my moment of desperate need, she was there. She let me love her and she loved me back, despite how much I hadn’t given her. She held no grudge. Her puppy love helped my heart that day, and more profoundly, opened my eyes to the choice one has in regards to love in relationships: One can choose to accept and receive, even when not on one’s terms, or constrain, expect, victimize and resent. She taught me to do the former.

What will I do without her?

The first week was really difficult. I felt her absence viscerally. But the distractions and demands of children and a puppy finally forced me over the hump. I mostly feel like a normal person who experiences sadness regularly rather than feeling withdrawn, broken and a mess all of the time. (I still hate that she’s gone.)

But, I have a new puppy to love. She’s not Paris. There will never be another Paris.




Luckily, Pepper is the world’s best cuddler. Her cute puppy-ness is helping my heart so much. She’s beautiful and incredibly smart. Antics such as thieving socks and chasing leaves across the snow bring joy and laughter. But, best of all is that puppy love.


On Importance

Everything: institution, industry, sport, group, genre, etc. has its own history, heroes, villains, popularity, prestige, etc.

To be deeply involved in a given thing provides affiliation, connection, community. It’s important. It feels important. There’s an inclination to overvalue this importance.

To have been part of multiple things defuses this sense of importance. The limit ranges from apathy to an over-inflated sense of self-importance/hero worship/an overarching belief that it ought to be important to everyone.

I think it wise to be somewhere in between: acknowledging that every thing matters to someone and no one thing matters to everyone. That importance is relative, yet valid.

Romance trumps machine language

Spend some time on social media, reading or watching the news and you’ll likely find most things reduced to a bullet point, a Top 10 list or otherwise boiled-down nugget of proffered wisdom.

Is it that people no longer care to the think for themselves, or that they’re simply too inundated with the opinions and proof from everyone else that they mistake the consumption of said information for thinking?

We humans created machines to do repetitive, tedious, time-consuming tasks so that we could apply our brains elsewhere. And yet, doesn’t it seem as though we’re becoming more like the machines than liberated, sophisticated refined beings? Machines require a special language, binary in nature, reducing to combinations of zeros and ones. But people can handle romance, where romance is defined as “something that lacks basis in fact” and fact is defined as “a thing that is indisputably the case”. How many facts are there, really? I’m 37 years old (where a year is defined as 365 days except in a leap year of 366). I’m of the female sex. My dog is black (according to the cones and rods in my retinas and related circuitry in my brain). I like to think of romance as complex, something that can’t be measured or proven definitively. Society seems to have a fixation with proof, wanting to know the answer, the truth, as though such things exist. The problem with proof is that it requires simplification and assumptions, all which are value-laden and relative; proof is a proxy for thinking.

Michael Pollen in The Omnivore’s Dilemma wrote about soil fertility and a farmer’s perspective of its complexity compared to Big Agra’s oversimplification of and reliance on fertilizer (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) to grow crops. His words (below) are relevant to the theme of complexity versus binary thinking as they portray the importance of the complex and limitations of the binary, which can be applied to just about any topic meriting discussion.

“Complex qualities are reduced to simple quantities; biology gives way to chemistry. As [the farmer] was not the first to point out, that method can only deal with one or two variables at a time. The problem is that once science has reduced a complex phenomenon to a couple of variables, however important they may be, the natural tendency is to overlook everything else, to assume that what you can measure is all there is, or at least all that really matters. When we mistake what we can know for all there is to know, a healthy appreciation of one’s ignorance in the face of a mystery like soil fertility gives way to the hubris that we can treat nature as a machine.”

Science is often bastardized in today’s society in an effort to make a point or serve a political interest, when in fact, science as a course of study is anything but binary. A true scientist is one who devotes their career to exploring a subject and its body of literature, contributing to it, inquiring, collaborating with one’s peers, etc. In today’s society the fruits of science are often used to silence the opposition when the real root of science is inquiry, which leads to research to build on a long history of complex subject matter. A person who throws out a data point as a means of oppressing one’s opponent should always be questioned. Science never shuns the questioner, science has nothing to fear, because there is no end to science, not in any topic or of any subject matter. There is always more to explore, research, clarify, understand, apply, redefine, and so forth.

I invested a lot of time thinking about adults when I was a kid, the way they were responsible and knew what was right and how to do it. I couldn’t comprehend why my parents didn’t seem to fulfill my expectations of other adults.

One evening when I was nineteen and waiting tables at a country club during my freshman year of college, I experienced a pivotal moment, the kind that left me unhinged and reeling. The menu was pricy; the people who dined at Seasons At Hilltop those Friday evenings (the only night it was open to the public as it was otherwise a banquet facility) were successful, they had money. They were responsible and did the right things, according to my then-binary thinking.

A man sat at a four-top with his wife and two children, and upon receiving his meal, berated me for the preparation of his steak. I assured him I would resolve the matter, but that didn’t resolve his anger. He continued going off on me. I remembered wanting to say, “Do you think I cooked the steak? Don’t you know anything about how restaurants work?” Instead I offered him a complimentary dessert. When that didn’t satisfy him, I sort of checked out, lost amidst the thoughts drowning my brain, things like, “Wow, this guy’s an asshole—how can he behave this way in front of his kids? What is he teaching them by acting this way?” and “We’re fucked. The universe is fucked. There are these morons—everywhere—cloaked as adults, and…holy shit…we’re so fucked!”

My little theory (which was really a philosophy premised in security) that real adults behaved as they should had just been blown out of the water.

Ultimately I went to my manager and let her handle the irate (so-called) man, as reason and sensibility were lost on him and that’s all I was armed with (a common theme in my life for years to come). Sure, the epiphany stuck with me, but it took a long time for me to synthesize it and develop skills beyond what I knew (reason and sensibility).

I think back to that scenario from time-to-time. Most recently it was because I just sort of realized I’m almost forty. By almost I mean closer to forty than thirty. That means I’m one of those adults I perceived as a child and young adult. I’m supposed to know All The Things and do them right, all the time, according to my nineteen-year-old self. But I don’t. I can’t even know what’s right most times, and right isn’t really worth aiming for in many cases anyway. Implicit in right is definitive, black-and-white. Yet shades of gray are more prevalent. As I move through life, sometimes gracefully, most times awkwardly, I’m constantly reminded that everything is related, dynamic, iterative, and not at all definitive.

My thirty-seven-year-old self focuses more on being consistent with my values. On being authentic and honest. I’m patient instead of hasty in the face of the unknown. I have more questions than answers. I’m willing to be vulnerable where previously I might have felt embarrassed. I want to be someone who matters. Mostly I want to be a person my children do and can respect as they evolve into their adult selves. I make mistakes all the time. I apologize to my kids. I ask for do-overs when frustration gets the best of me. That’s my I’m-almost-forty definition of being a real adult. It’s far more romantic (and messy) than binary. My nineteen-year-old self would think it irrational and stupid. How naïve would I be to mistaken wisdom and an appreciation of life’s complexity for simplistic idiocy? As for my thirty-seven-year-old self, romance trumps machine language.

Black ink

I started keeping a journal back in 1998 when I stumbled upon a stray composition book in the desk drawer in a room I rented that summer. I used to write in any variety of ink color available to me. But upon writing the initial entry in Volume IV of my journal in August 1999, I started using black ink only. (Well, with the exception of a few entries in blue ink over the next two years, which conjured obvious disdain, evidenced by the entries that followed. Thankfully blue ink didn’t blemish journals beyond Volume IV.)

My absolute favorite pen to write with is the uni-ball Vision 0.5mm. I buy them by the dozen. Over the past few weeks I’ve had to chuck several as they ran out of ink. Little is more frustrating than straining to maintain consistent weight of letters as a pen nears its death. Then again, having to write with a ballpoint is equally if not more frustrating. (I’m a pen snob and rarely yield to using pens available to me at a doctor’s office or business; chances are I’m packing a uni-ball Vision somewhere on my person, and opt for that.) I bought another dozen today, and I’m not at all embarrassed to say buying a fresh dozen pens is as good a fix as drinking coffee or eating chocolate.

Here are my new pens, in all of their full-of-ink glory, stacked neatly upon Volume X; the five remainders from the previous dozen are off to the left, fearing their last letter.

In progress

After several months of latency, I’ve reacquainted myself with Undone. My relationship with the title itself is tenuous; it describes the state of the manuscript and taunts that it shall forever remain as such. That’s why I’m particularly happy to report that the rewriting is officially in progress!

Undone|Progress May 31, 2015 (2)

Anna’s undergoing a small makeover. I’m combing through the pages, updating accordingly to solidify her transformation.

My goal? To finish the novel in time to start my second novel this November for NaNoWriMo.

I just love lofty goals, don’t you?

Just be

You see the posts on Facebook, read the headlines in the papers, hear the ads on television and radio. Seemingly anything of value needs to be…

The best
Ground breaking
Hype hype hype

You should make more money
You should be valued more
You should want _________

We’ve sold ourselves to the entities with the deepest pockets, deferred our authority to the premiere sociopaths. We’ve handed over our perceptions and lives to those with the audacity to tell us how to live.

What ever happened to using our own minds? What ever happened to just being?

Is it really so wrong to not want All The Things?

Is it really so wrong to be a woman, enjoying her job and un-worrying about her salary, despite the data showing that men make more?

Is it really so wrong to hang up one’s professional career to parent one’s children and pursue one’s personal interests?

Is it really so wrong to respect oneself and live one’s life according to one’s own scruples?

Is it really so wrong to __________________________?

Of course the only person who can define one’s value is oneself; deferring it to others is a choice.

Maybe the only thing anyone’s missing is nothing.

The line, the tipping point, or the sheep

Do you rest easily with the role of modern governments in our country, or do you question the ethical and health ramifications of the trajectory of governments abusing their powers?

What will it take to cross the line of the average citizen’s comfort? Perhaps the jump from 23 doses of 7 required vaccines in 1983 to 48 doses of 14 (by age 6!!) in 2014 isn’t enough. What will be? How many diseases should we fear? How many warrant chemically-induced protection? Will it be 100 doses? 40 vaccines? More?

Might the line be crossed when the public learns of the National Adult Immunization Plan (published February 5, 2015)? Is the adult vaccine schedule palatable? Will the addition of pertussis to tetanus every ten years, annual influenza, and vaccines for pneumococcal (pneumonia), Hib, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Varicella (chicken pox), meningococcal, MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), HPV and Zoster be enough to cross the line?

What will happen when vaccinations are required for employment (beyond healthcare workers)?

What if government starts overreaching in other areas as well; what if counties and states start mandating treatment for diseases and illnesses based on diagnosis alone, raping individuals of the right to second and third opinions, seeking alternative treatments or foregoing any treatment whatsoever? Will that cross the line?

Or might the masses begin to take offense to the pandering by pharma and government via help by the media, stop fighting with their fellow citizens, and start asking questions and demanding answers? Will the tipping point of concerned citizens be reached, enough of them to effectively pressure the government to back off?

Or will the thinkers and questioners slowly be silenced or jailed, until only the sheep remain?